DB Backup - Single User Mode

Tx for your responses.
I completely understand and accept that there is no need to do a
backup in single user mode, but for one case if the server is already
in single user mode ..
Here is what I found, in SQL 2000 it was possible to do the
backups(in single user mode) while the SQL 2005 server fails to accept
the connection for backup (the same code/binary SQL-DMO statements are
used for both).
Are there any major changes between SQL server 2000 and SQL server
2005 ?
On Oct 31, 3:02 am, "Tibor Karaszi"
<tibor_please.no.email_kara...@.hotmail.nomail.com> wrote:[vbcol=seagreen]
> If you mean regular backups (usingBACKUPDATABASE andBACKUPLOG commands), then no, no need to set
> the database tosingleusermode...
> --
> Tibor Karaszi,SQLServer MVPhttp://www.karaszi.com/sqlserver/default.asphttp://sqlblog.com/blogs/tibor_karaszi
> "velu5" <thirumalaiv...@.gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:1193743910.012534.3610@.v29g2000prd.googlegrou ps.com...
>
What's New in SQL Server 2005:
http://www.microsoft.com/sql/prodinfo/overview/whats-new-in-sqlserver2005.mspx
http://technet.microsoft.com/tr-tr/library/ms170363(en-us).aspx
Ekrem nsoy
"velu5" <thirumalaivelu@.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:eb680ec9-d7c5-40c2-bec6-bbbdeada23af@.e23g2000prf.googlegroups.com...
> Tx for your responses.
> I completely understand and accept that there is no need to do a
> backup in single user mode, but for one case if the server is already
> in single user mode ..
> Here is what I found, in SQL 2000 it was possible to do the
> backups(in single user mode) while the SQL 2005 server fails to accept
> the connection for backup (the same code/binary SQL-DMO statements are
> used for both).
> Are there any major changes between SQL server 2000 and SQL server
> 2005 ?
>
> On Oct 31, 3:02 am, "Tibor Karaszi"
> <tibor_please.no.email_kara...@.hotmail.nomail.com> wrote:
>